<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bomb.bio | Erik | Activity</title>
	<link>https://bomb.bio/members/erik21/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bomb.bio/members/erik21/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Erik.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 20:24:12 +1200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">812b61805962d49279d01369a69ecc6c</guid>
				<title>Erik started the topic Recovery loss for large volumes - role of wash buffer volume? in the forum Clean-up and size exclusion</title>
				<link>https://bomb.bio/forums/topic/recovery-loss-for-large-volumes-role-of-wash-buffer-volume/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 21:39:58 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using this protocol to clean up DNA template after a linearization reaction (removal of buffer &amp; enzyme, rather than size selection). On a small scale, it works quite well with recovery rates around 75-80% out of the box.</p>
<p>However, when I scale it up, I am reaching conditions where my recovery suddenly drops to below 60% while DNA:bead as well&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-52017"><a href="https://bomb.bio/forums/topic/recovery-loss-for-large-volumes-role-of-wash-buffer-volume/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9f2854975bc69e2d6c4ec213a71a58f9</guid>
				<title>Erik became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://bomb.bio/activity/p/52015/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 21:41:29 +1200</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>