<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bomb.bio | Jennifer Kuehl | Activity</title>
	<link>https://bomb.bio/members/jvkuehl/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://bomb.bio/members/jvkuehl/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Jennifer Kuehl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 20:24:12 +1200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">136d6c9c38fcd554956fe2d46a9f311e</guid>
				<title>Jennifer Kuehl replied to the topic BOMB protocol #7.1 gDNA extraction in the forum gDNA</title>
				<link>https://bomb.bio/forums/topic/bomb-protocol-7-1-gdna-extraction/#post-9513</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 05:03:59 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>I am also getting very low 260/230 ratios.  I tried up to eight 80% ethanol washes, the ratios  improve with more washing but  they are still low ~.6 for gram positive bacteria and 1.7 for gram negative.  I am considering  a larger volumes of 70% ethanol (600ul) for the wash steps or perhaps a secondary bead clean-up.  Any recommendations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9aec0f793cdb9e1df9fecf10f1df3067</guid>
				<title>Jennifer Kuehl became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://bomb.bio/activity/p/4876/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 22:21:03 +1200</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>