- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated November 24, 2022 at 4:04 pm by admin.
- AuthorPosts
- September 3, 2022 at 3:20 am #18218
Hi All,
Thanks for making this forum, I love the idea and the project. We’ve been using magnetic beads for our minipreps for a while now but for our use case contamination with even very small amounts of DNA can cause issues downstream. We’ve been trying to find a way to either break down the genomic DNA or do a size selection afterwards as the trace genomic DNA seems to be present regardless of preparation method/lab personnel, but reading through the 4.1, 5.1 and 5.2 protocols it occurred to me that the protocols are similar enough that perhaps a size selection step could be inserted into the plasmid extraction protocol.
This is what I’m imagining it would look like, starting after the addition of N3 buffer
- centrifuge to pellet cell debris
- transfer 500 uL supernatant to new plate
- Add Ethanol to bind genomic DNA to beads (250-350 uL? would need to be determined experimentally)
- add magnetic beads
- mix
- bind beads & transfer supernatant containing plasmid DNA to new plate (save for later)
- Add EB to beads to elute genomic DNA from beads
- Immobilize beads and discard EB
- Refresh with New EB & discard again
- Transfer supernatant from step 6 back onto beads
- Add additional ethanol (150-250 uL)
- continue with plasmid extraction as normal
Does anybody have any thoughts on the feasibility of this before I give it a shot?
November 24, 2022 at 4:04 pm #18236Ahoy,
In a way I hope you already solved the challenge and I am therefore too late.
But maybe not so I figure I may as well share my thoughts.
I do not know the exact composition of Qiagen N3 but since it is a silica binding buffer I would assume several things that may not be ideal for your purpose.- DNA (Including Plasmids) is already precipitated -> spinning may lead to some loss.
- The precipitated DNA in N3 will be charged and therefore sticky -> changing tube leads to loss.
- Adding ethanol at this point might lead to salting out and general precipitation of unwanted contaminants.
I do not understand why you would presume that you would be selectively binding plasmids in the procedure you describe.
All in all I think what you propose wont work but maybe you have already tried it and can prove me wrong?However, could you consider simply using Exonuclease 5 (V)?
From personal experience ExoV is amazingly good at chewing up anything non circular.Cheers
Tim M
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.